18th century, again
Or, The Bird Dress!
Currently still under construction, but I'd venture to say the bulk of the construction is done. (Trim is a whole different animal...)
You see - I'm hosting an 18thc tea at the Indian King Tavern ("can my friends and I play dress up and have tea here?? Yes? COOL"), and naturally I wanted a new dress! Naturally. I particularly wanted a specifically white-backed chintz cotton print. Why? I dunno, I don't have one of those yet? There are some lovely reproduction prints out there, but they're all on the pricey end. So I scoured one of my favorite ebay stores, as I've bought lovely Indian block-printed fabric for Regency frocks before, and two most excellent shawls. And I came up with this fabric, which made me happy.
It's not totally perfect, as it's a bit densely printed for a 1770s dress I think, and I found a grand total of one chintz fabric with a bird.
But it was in a much better price range, and as I like to cheerfully remind people, I am not a reenactor! So I deem it quite Good Enough For Me.
Did the petticoat first:
And then had to decide, did I want a full-length polonaise gown, or a polonaise jacket? Waffle waffle...Mocked up and cut out the lining (as that would be the same for either gown or jacket):
...and really couldn't go any further without finally deciding what I was making! Cassidy's survey of the Galerie des Modes provided me with a halfway point - the circassienne. Most circassiennes seem to have a particular type of sleeve (that I'm not making), so I'm hesitant to call it a circassienne. Not every single one does, though - and I don't think a polonaise with a slightly shorter skirt is that wildly out of the realm of possibility, considering all the dozens of slight variation in 18thc dresses!
Don't quote me, though. ;)
Took these shots before hemming/sewing up the skirt seams, and I look completely miserable, but I'm actually quite pleased!
I didn't take any pictures of the draping process, as this is my first polonaise-type-thing, and I wasn't entirely sure I was going about it in the right order. When I make the nice polonaise I have (striped!) silk for, I'll see if I can manage a step-by-step.
Because I've heard a lot about how scary polonaises are to make (which seems to be bourne out by the fact that hardly anyone seems to make them, relative to other styles)...but I think they're really not any more difficult than a sack gown or an en-fourreau English gown! With the caveat that you be fairly familiar with 18thc dress construction and be comfortable with a certain amount of draping. But really. If you've made a sack or an en fourreau gown, you can make a polonaise!
Anyway. So as you saw, I had a fitted lining out of linen - you can do that, or you can make a stomacher, or a separate back-closing sleeveless bodice, but I think over a simple fitted lining is the easiest - and I used three widths of 30" fabric. One went over each front, and the third I ripped in half, so as to have a CB seam. I did the backs first as they didn't require much actual draping, just "is there enough fabric in the back pleats? yes? excellent."
The fronts took a bit more fussing - I draped them on my dressform initially and pinned, then did another fitting on myself. One side was perfect, other needed a bit of messing around and repinning, but nothing too horrible.
The loose fronts feel a bit silly - they blow open when I walk, for one, but I think trim will help with that...at least to some extent! After it was hemmed, I took a few shots on Mabel, who doesn't fit in it as well, but it's easier to take close-ups on her! Not that you can see much detail anyway, with this busy print, but hey, I tried!
I'm currently working on some fiddly trimmings of the fronts and skirt, but when I get tired of that I should probably put on some sleeves...
Currently still under construction, but I'd venture to say the bulk of the construction is done. (Trim is a whole different animal...)
I know it's not very impressive over my under-petticoat, but you can't see any detail at all with the matching one! |
You see - I'm hosting an 18thc tea at the Indian King Tavern ("can my friends and I play dress up and have tea here?? Yes? COOL"), and naturally I wanted a new dress! Naturally. I particularly wanted a specifically white-backed chintz cotton print. Why? I dunno, I don't have one of those yet? There are some lovely reproduction prints out there, but they're all on the pricey end. So I scoured one of my favorite ebay stores, as I've bought lovely Indian block-printed fabric for Regency frocks before, and two most excellent shawls. And I came up with this fabric, which made me happy.
It's not totally perfect, as it's a bit densely printed for a 1770s dress I think, and I found a grand total of one chintz fabric with a bird.
But it did exist! And they're even a similar type of bird! |
Did the petticoat first:
Do plan on a flounce, but need to be certain that I can get important things like sleeves cut out first... |
All cut from linen scraps, hence the weird CF piecing |
Don't quote me, though. ;)
Took these shots before hemming/sewing up the skirt seams, and I look completely miserable, but I'm actually quite pleased!
I didn't take any pictures of the draping process, as this is my first polonaise-type-thing, and I wasn't entirely sure I was going about it in the right order. When I make the nice polonaise I have (striped!) silk for, I'll see if I can manage a step-by-step.
Because I've heard a lot about how scary polonaises are to make (which seems to be bourne out by the fact that hardly anyone seems to make them, relative to other styles)...but I think they're really not any more difficult than a sack gown or an en-fourreau English gown! With the caveat that you be fairly familiar with 18thc dress construction and be comfortable with a certain amount of draping. But really. If you've made a sack or an en fourreau gown, you can make a polonaise!
Anyway. So as you saw, I had a fitted lining out of linen - you can do that, or you can make a stomacher, or a separate back-closing sleeveless bodice, but I think over a simple fitted lining is the easiest - and I used three widths of 30" fabric. One went over each front, and the third I ripped in half, so as to have a CB seam. I did the backs first as they didn't require much actual draping, just "is there enough fabric in the back pleats? yes? excellent."
The fronts took a bit more fussing - I draped them on my dressform initially and pinned, then did another fitting on myself. One side was perfect, other needed a bit of messing around and repinning, but nothing too horrible.
The loose fronts feel a bit silly - they blow open when I walk, for one, but I think trim will help with that...at least to some extent! After it was hemmed, I took a few shots on Mabel, who doesn't fit in it as well, but it's easier to take close-ups on her! Not that you can see much detail anyway, with this busy print, but hey, I tried!
You really can't see it, but there are two vertical(ish) tucks under the arm to fit the looseness of the fronts. |
Yes, those two tucks release into uneven pleats! I'm uneven, is why. |
Looking good! Yes, the Polonaise fronts are fussy, which is why you noticed so few people are afraid to make them. There was a lot of variation, though, with how loose or how fitted the front pieces were. With the very loose, much less fuss, and really quite a flattering line. It will all look fantastic and perfect once you get all pieces and accessories put together, even if it feels weird now. :-)
ReplyDeleteThanks! I guess I'm so used to an 18thc gown being fitted within an inch of its life, these flappy fronts feel silly, haha. I'm happy to represent, though - they're all over period prints and illustrations, and they're a nice variation on All The Anglaises, All The Time! :D
Delete